Skip to main content

Writers Groups—How to Make them Work

You know you can't be a writer unless you have your work reviewed by other people. You know this. You've read it in other blog postings. You've seen it in interviews with authors. No writer can make their work shine as brightly as it can without the assistance of others. For those attached to large publishing houses, you are lucky enough to have a skilled editor going through your work for you, pointing out what could be better, or simply what needs to go in the trash. For the rest of us, we have to hire an editor, which is expensive—and frankly, not a good use of money with a first, or even second, draft.

The solution? Writer's groups. Preferably more than one, assuming you have the time and the gas money. I am only involved in one, specifically the Monday Night Writers, a small but active group that is mostly sci-fi, fantasy, and horror with some creative nonfiction and children's fiction thrown in for good measure. They are wonderful for a few specific reasons. At first, I overlooked these strengths and assumed all writer's groups were like this one. But then I joined a different writer's group in Las Vegas, and got quite an education. This group has been a lifesaver in terms of my writing, and the other members feel the same way. So if you want to join a group, or are thinking of starting one, I recommend seeking out a group following these best practices:

The Group is Closed, meaning not just anyone can drop in. In order to join our group, you have to send an email asking to come. Assuming we have a spot open, you are invited to a meeting as a guest so you can see how we do things. If it's a good fit, both for you and for us, we invite you to join. Open groups, like the one I briefly went to in Las Vegas, can be counterproductive if a combative person comes or if an unprepared person comes. It is a waste of people's time and makes the group a chore instead of a joy. Not one second of group time should be devoted to telling adults how to behave. In a closed group, that is never an issue.

Read at Home, Critique in the Group. We email our submissions by Friday. That way, when the Monday group starts, each member has been able to read each submission, mark it up for grammar, mechanics, and compose their thoughts for the critique. What worked and what didn't? How is this progressing the story? Or how does it stand as its own piece? Most other groups I have attended either have the author read their piece aloud or set aside time for everyone to read the submission. But both of those methods, IMHO, are terrible. Fiction, unlike poetry, is designed to be read, not listened to. Not all authors are good narrators, and it can detract from the overall quality of the writing. Reading it silently at the group meeting is also problematic. Not everyone reads at the same speed. What if you want to read it more than once? And our meeting, like most others, is at a café. Kinda noisy sometimes. So devoting our time to critique instead of reading works very well and elicits great commentary.

Constructive Criticism Only. "This type of writing just isn't my thing." "I hate present-tense writing." These are not helpful criticisms to the author. We judge each piece based on the audience it is written for and how effective it is in communicating the story and the characters. And if the subject matter or genre is uncomfortable for you...

No Judgment. If you don't feel comfortable reading or critiquing erotica, you don't have to. If reading violent scenes is upsetting, you don't have to. We usually put a disclaimer on submissions that may not be to everyone's tastes, and anyone who wishes not to critique has that choice. We are here to support each other after all.

It can be hard to hear your work isn't awesome, especially if you're new to writing and all your friends have been telling you that it's great. But it takes a long time and a great deal of work to master any craft. Writing is no different. And hearing from other writers who are from a different generation and/or write a different genre will only make you better. I took several classes from author Maxwell Alexander Drake. If you haven't read his fantasy novels, you have probably heard of or spend unhealthy amounts of time playing the game he is head writer for, EverQuest Next. He liked to say that you will never make everyone happy, but a good indicator is the 80% rule. If 8 out of 10 people like your stuff, you can rest easy knowing that it is objectively good. Anything less than that, and you need to get in more practice.


  1. Evonna Hedbavny Race
    I was a member, but I do not see my name and would like to attend the meeting tonight. Hope you are well and am excited to get back to writing. or 816-914-3969

  2. Hi Evonna. We actually have a full roster right now, thanks to our two most recent members. We keep the Meetup page active so that potential members can keep in touch when we have an opening. If we have a member who leaves the group or takes an extended sabbatical, I consult the meetup page to find a new member.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Psychopaths - Part 2 of my Daredevil Review

I will start this review with a mandatory disclosure: I love me some Vinnie D. That's Vincent D'Onofrio to you normal folks. I love him in everything he has ever done. I loved him as the sweet yet prideful young man in Mystic Pizza, I loved him in his small role as "Thor" in Adventures of Babysitting, I loved him when he wore an Edgar suit in Men in Black, and I loved him the mostest in Law & Order: Criminal Intent. So while I'll be telling you the strengths and weaknesses of the show, don't be concerned when I seem to love the villain more than the hero.

Though Kingpin AKA Wilson Fisk had a small cameo in the Defenders, Season 3 of Daredevil marked his triumphant return to the status of Big Bad. And make no mistake, Wilson Fisk is as Big and Bad as they come. Obey him or he will kill you. Though he might kill you even if you do obey him. Hypothetically, he might savagely crush your head in if you are simply the bearer of bad news. Hypothetically.


On Faith - Part One of my Daredevil Review

"I would rather die as Daredevil than live as Matt Murdock."

As I mentioned in my review of Daredevil Season 2,  I love this show, so I didn't want to simply write another review. Instead, I chose to write three articles on what I saw as the three main strengths of this season: its honest depiction or faith and the struggles of mere mortals to live it; the effects of psychopathy and the morality of treating people who have it; and the ability of friendships to fill the hole left by a missing family. In my Season 2 review, I mentioned how the show's writers have stayed true to the spirit of the comic in their characters, in the actors they cast, and the direction of the plot. Season 3 begins with another strong and unapologetic nod to the original comic: its focus on Matt's faith, or in this case, his loss of it.

In the last episode of The Defenders, a building fell directly on top of Matt Murdock, AKA Daredevil, as well as Elektra, the love of his life whose sou…

Review of the Demon Cycle Series: When Ideology Ruins a Good Story

A world once modern and learned condemned to repeat the dark ages after demons rise from the earth's core every night to feast on humans.

Peter V. Brett starts off the Demon Cycle series in a single small town and grows to world-size proportions. Frankly, it's a master class in high fantasy world-building. It's never explicitly said in the books, but I think the Demon Cycle series takes place in our own distant future—after all our technology failed us in the face of demons. It's that subtlety of world building and the intricacy of plot that makes the Demon Cycle books so outstanding... at least the first three.

Because I love this world and these characters so much, I became truly angry with the direction the series took and my perception of why the author made these choices. As with all my reviews, there will be spoilers, but nothing that should prevent you from reading these books. Your life will be better for it, even with its flaws.

The Warded Man: The Warded Man …